By 1972, constraints placed on ballistic missiles by the SALT I
treaty prompted U.S. nuclear strategists to think again about using
cruise missiles. There was also concern over Soviet advances in
antiship cruise missile technology, and in Vietnam remotely piloted
vehicles had demonstrated considerable reliability in gathering
intelligence information over previously inaccessible, highly defended
areas. Improvements in electronics—in particular, microcircuits,
solid-state memory, and computer processing—presented inexpensive,
lightweight, and highly reliable methods of solving the persistent
problems of guidance and control. Perhaps most important, terrain
contour mapping, or Tercom, techniques, derived from the earlier Atran, offered excellent en route and terminal-area accuracy.
Tercom
used a radar or photographic image from which a digitalized contour map
was produced. At selected points in the flight known as Tercom
checkpoints, the guidance system would match a radar image of the
missile's current position with the programmed digital image, making
corrections to the missile's flight path in order to place it on the
correct course. Between Tercom checkpoints, the missile would be guided
by an advanced inertial system; this would eliminate the need for
constant radar emissions, which would make electronic detection
extremely difficult. As the flight progressed, the size of the radar
map would be reduced, improving accuracy. In practice, Tercom brought
the CEP of modern cruise missiles down to less than 150 feet (see
Figure 1).
Improvements in engine design also made cruise
missiles more practical. In 1967 the Williams International Corporation
produced a small turbofan engine (12 inches in diameter, 24 inches
long) that weighed less than 70 pounds and produced more than 400
pounds of thrust. New fuel mixtures offered more than 30-percent
increases in fuel energy, which translated directly into extended range.
By
the end of the Vietnam War, both the U.S. Navy and Air Force had cruise
missile projects under way. At 19 feet three inches, the navy's sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM; eventually designated the Tomahawk) was 30 inches shorter than the air force's air-launched cruise missile
(ALCM), but system components were quite similar and often from the
same manufacturer (both missiles used the Williams engine and the
McDonnell Douglas Corporation's Tercom). The Boeing Company produced
the ALCM, while the General Dynamics Corporation produced the SLCM as
well as the ground-launched cruise missile,
or GLCM. The SLCM and GLCM were essentially the same configuration,
differing only in their basing mode. The GLCM was designed to be
launched from wheeled transporter-erector-launchers, while the SLCM was
expelled from submarine tubes to the ocean surface in steel canisters
or launched directly from armoured box launchers aboard surface ships.
Both the SLCM and GLCM were propelled from their launchers or canisters
by a solid-rocket booster, which dropped off after the wings and tail
fins flipped out and the jet engine ignited. The ALCM, being dropped
from a bomb-bay dispenser or wing pylon of a flying B-52 or B-1 bomber,
did not require rocket boosting.
As finally deployed, the U.S.
cruise missiles were intermediate-range weapons that flew at an
altitude of 100 feet to a range of 1,500 miles. The SLCM was produced
in three versions: a tactical-range (275-mile) antiship missile, with a
combination of inertial guidance and active radar homing and with a high-explosive
warhead; and two intermediate-range land-attack versions, with combined
inertial and Tercom guidance and with either a high-explosive or a
200-kiloton nuclear warhead. The ALCM carried the same nuclear warhead
as the SLCM, while the GLCM carried a low-yield warhead of 10 to 50
kilotons.
The ALCM entered service in 1982 and the SLCM in 1984.
The GLCM was first deployed to Europe in 1983, but all GLCMs were
dismantled after the signing of the INF Treaty.
Although their
small size and low flight paths made the ALCM and SLCM difficult to
detect by radar (the ALCM presented a radar cross section only one
one-thousandth that of the B-52 bomber), their subsonic speed of about
500 miles per hour made them vulnerable to air defenses once they were
detected. For this reason, the U.S. Air Force began production of an
advanced cruise missile, which would incorporate stealth technologies
such as radar-absorbent materials and smooth, nonreflective surface
shapes. The advanced cruise missile would have a range of over 1,800
miles.
0 comments:
Post a Comment